Up 7,298% thanks to this “hated” stock

Hey it's Wendy.

The Wall Street Journal recently ran an article that said:

"This Fund Is Up 7,298% in 10 Years. You Don't Want It."

I almost spit out my coffee when I read that.

Because I've been using this fund to potentially generate an average monthly income of $10,010.60 on paper during my testing.

And it's all thanks to the exact same fund that the Wall Street Journal seems to despise.

Go here for the name of the ticker and my trading strategy...

The WSJ Hates This 1 Ticker. Here's How We're Getting The Last Laugh...

Wendy Kirkland

The information provided by the newsletters, trading, training and educational products related to various markets (collectively referred to as the "Services") is not customized or personalized to any particular risk profile or tolerance. Nor is the information published by Universal Financial Independence Inc., ("Universal") a customized or personalized recommendation to buy, sell, hold, or invest in particular financial products. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Trading and investing involve substantial risk and is not appropriate for everyone. The actual profit results presented here may vary with the actual profit results presented in other Universal Financial Independence, Inc. publications due to the different strategies and time frames presented in other publications. Trading on margin carries a high level of risk, and may not be suitable for all investors. Other than the refund policy detailed elsewhere, Universal does not make any guarantee or other promise as to any results that may be obtained from using the Services. Universal disclaims any and all liability for any investment or trading loss sustained by a subscriber. You should trade or invest only "risk capital" - money you can afford to lose. Trading stocks and stock options involves high risk and you can lose the entire principal amount invested or more. There is no guarantee that systems, indicators, or trading signals will result in profits or that they will not produce losses.

Some profit examples are based on hypothetical or simulated trading. This means the trades are not actual trades and instead are hypothetical trades based on real market prices at the time the recommendation is disseminated. No actual money is invested, nor are any trades executed. Hypothetical or simulated performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. Also, the hypothetical results do not include the costs of subscriptions, commissions, or other fees. Because the trades underlying these examples have not actually been executed, the results may understate or overstate the impact of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity. Universal makes no representations or warranties that any account will or is likely to achieve profits similar to those shown. No representation is being made that you will achieve profits or the same results as any person providing a testimonial. No representation is being made that any person providing a testimonial is likely to continue to experience profitable trading after the date on which the testimonial was provided, and in fact the person providing the testimonial may have subsequently experienced losses. Wendy Kirkland's experiences are not typical. Wendy Kirkland is an experienced investor and your results will vary depending on risk tolerance, amount of risk capital utilized, size of trading position, willingness to follow the rules and other factors.

This email was sent to penunggangbadai.moneyblog@blogger.com by wendy@tradewins.com

TradeWins Publishing Corp.528 North Country Rd.St. James, NY 11780

Up 7,298% thanks to this “hated” stock

0 Response to "Up 7,298% thanks to this “hated” stock"

Post a Comment

Populer Post

Arsip Blog

Up 7,298% thanks to this “hated” stock

Related Posts :

0 Response to "Up 7,298% thanks to this “hated” stock"

Post a Comment