Finding Great Trades That Exploit Oil Insanity

 

This market seems a bit slick right now.  Ups and downs, is it rigged?

Okay, enough with the puns that will make sense in a moment, but first, as usual, let’s check in last week’s idea.  And for that, we take a look at QQQ, the NASDAQ 100 ETF:

As you can see, it’s been a rocket higher.  The FOMC was spectacular for tech with its changing verbiage.  Tech earnings were generally good.  Everything lined up with the technicals, and tech took the elevator up instead of climbing the stairs.  It was truly an incredible week for tech, and congrats to all tech bulls out there that were holding for that move.

When you know these key setups, spotting the lucrative Outlier trades gets crazy easy. Click here for your Outlier Roadmap.

But, we’re not here to just look at what happened last week.  Of course, the goal is to find the next move.  With the way stocks have moved in general over the last week, my target is to find a contrarian play.  Bullish stocks have simply gotten more overbought than I like.

And for that, I like to go to the seemingly only sector that hasn’t been bullish.  However, over the last few years, it’s been very bullish.  And there’s reason for fundamental investors to still bet on it being bullish.  Let’s look at oil, and we’ll do so with the ETF USO:

It’s not pretty after Tuesday’s collapse.  However, gaps up and gaps down tend to be opportunities for short-term trades counter to that move.  What that means for me is that I can look for a short-term bullish play in oil-related stocks.  And my favorite ETF to play that kind of move with some leverage is OIH:

As you can see, it’s not a pretty picture.  If we repeat the response to moves up and down in oil like we did on September 27th (up), October 4th (down), and October 19th (up), we can see reason to try do “fade the move” (a little trader speak on this one).  And if the 200-Day Moving Average fails to hold for OIH, maybe it’s time to walk away.  This is a great setup for defined risk, significant leverage, and a clean trade plan.

Of course, for me personally, I’ll now take that input and apply it to my research on many individual names in oil names.  I’ll then look for names to add to my Outlier Watch List that can perform strongly in a bullish market environment, figure out how best to leverage those trades with options, define my risk, and look for some really interesting trading strategies.  If you want to learn more, make sure you sign up for my Outlier Watch List now!

As always, please go to http://optionhotline.com to review how I traditionally apply technical signals, volatility analysis, and probability analysis to my options trades.  As always, if you have any questions, never hesitate to reach out.

Keith Harwood

Keith@optionhotline.com


See Related Articles on TradewinsDaily.com

Finding Great Trades That Exploit Oil Insanity

Chart of the Day: Revisiting CRISPR Therapeutics (CRSP)

Chart of the Day: Intel (INTC)

This Rally Sets Up Key Point To Watch

Which Way Is Kohls Heading? Take a Look.


TradeWins Logo
 

© 2023 Tradewins Publishing. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us

Auto-trading, or any broker or advisor-directed type of trading, is not supported or endorsed by TradeWins. For additional information on auto-trading, you may visit the SEC's website: All About Auto-Trading, https://www.sec.gov/reportspubs/investor-publications/investorpubsautotradinghtm.html
TradeWins does not recommend or refer subscribers to broker-dealers. You should perform your own due diligence with respect to satisfactory broker-dealers and whether to open a brokerage account. You should always consult with your own professional advisers regarding equities and options on equities trading.

1. The information provided by the newsletters, trading, training and educational products related to various markets (collectively referred to as the "Services") is not customized or personalized to any particular risk profile or tolerance. Nor is the information published by TradeWins Publishing ("TradeWins") a customized or personalized recommendation to buy, sell, hold, or invest in particular financial products. The Services are intended to supplement your own research and analysis.

2. TradeWins' Services are not a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any financial products, and the Services are not intended to provide money management advice or services.

3. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Trading and investing involve substantial risk. Trading on margin carries a high level of risk, and may not be suitable for all investors. Other than the refund policy detailed elsewhere, TradeWins does not make any guarantee or other promise as to any results that may be obtained from using the Services. No person subscribing for the Services ("Subscriber") should make any investment decision without first consulting his or her own personal financial adviser, broker or consultant. TradeWins disclaims any and all liability in the event anything contained in the Services proves to be inaccurate, incomplete or unreliable, or results in any investment or other loss by a Subscriber.

4. You should trade or invest only "risk capital" money you can afford to lose. Trading stocks and stock options involves high risk and you can lose the entire principal amount invested or more.

5. All investments carry risk and all trading decisions made by a person remain the responsibility of that person. There is no guarantee that systems, indicators, or trading signals will result in profits or that they will not produce losses. Subscribers should fully understand all risks associated with any kind of trading or investing before engaging in such activities.

6. Some profit examples are based on hypothetical or simulated trading. This means the trades are not actual trades and instead are hypothetical trades based on real market prices at the time the recommendation is disseminated. No actual money is invested, nor are any trades executed. Hypothetical or simulated performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. Also, the hypothetical results do not include the costs of subscriptions, commissions, or other fees. Because the trades underlying these examples have not actually been executed, the results may understate or overstate the impact of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity. Simulated trading services in general are also designed with the benefit of hindsight, which may not be relevant to actual trading. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. TradeWins makes no representations or warranties that any account will or is likely to achieve profits similar to those shown.

7. No representation is being made that you will achieve profits or the same results as any person providing testimonial. No representation is being made that any person providing a testimonial is likely to continue to experience profitable trading after the date on which the testimonial was provided, and in fact the person providing the testimonial may have experienced losses.

8. The author experiences are not typical. The author is an experienced investor and your results will vary depending on risk tolerance, amount of risk capital utilized, size of trading position and other factors. Certain Subscribers may modify the author methods, or modify or ignore the rules or risk parameters, and any such actions are taken entirely at the Subscriber's own election and for the Subscriber's own risk.

You are currently subscribed to mwd as: penunggangbadai.moneyblog@blogger.com.
Add support@marketwealthdaily.com to your email address book to ensure delivery.
Forward to a Friend | Manage Subscription | Subscribe | Unsubscribe | Snooze
                                 

Subscribe to receive free email updates:

0 Response to "Finding Great Trades That Exploit Oil Insanity"

Post a Comment