Dear Fellow Investor,

A small government task force just finished a 20-year project.

They probably didn't realize their findings would allow everyday citizens to stake a claim on a $500 trillion national treasure.

But they did. And under U.S. law your birthright claim is now active.

This opportunity won't stay under the radar for long.

Click here to see how to claim your piece before Washington changes its mind.

"The Buck Stops Here,"

Dylan Jovine, CEO & Founder

Behind the Markets

P.S. This claim belongs to American citizens - but the first profits will go to those who move early. See the full briefing here.

Plastic Surgery: Winners and Losers of the Proposed 10% Interest Cap

Author: Jeffrey Neal Johnson. Article Posted: 1/13/2026.

Key Points

The market’s reaction reflected a selective repricing, with high-APR-dependent lenders hit hardest and fee-driven models holding up better.
A proposed 10% APR cap pressures subprime-focused card economics, widening the gap between traditional lenders and transaction-based platforms.
Investors appear to be positioning for a credit vacuum, where displaced borrowers migrate to alternative financing and payments ecosystems.

The market reaction in the finance and fintech sectors on Jan. 12, 2026, was not a panic sell-off. It was a deliberate, calculated sorting event. After the Trump administration announced a proposed 10% cap on credit card interest rates, the financial sector fractured. While headlines focused on broad index declines, a closer look reveals sharp divergence between two groups: traditional lenders and fintech companies.

Investors are witnessing what amounts to a Great Rate Bifurcation. Capital is moving away from business models that rely on high Annual Percentage Rates (APRs) and into alternative financing platforms. With the Federal Funds Rate currently between 3.5% and 3.75%, a 10% APR cap would squeeze traditional banks' profit margins. This policy shock, reminiscent of past usury-limit proposals, has created a sizable opportunity for companies that operate outside the conventional lending model.

The Extinction Zone: Why Lenders Are Being Punished

NEW LAW: Congress Approves Setup For Digital Dollar? (Ad)

Trump Ally Says Congress Approved the Setup for a Digital Dollar 2.0

But according to Rep. Marjorie Taylor Green, it's a bill that contains "the entire setup, groundwork and infrastructure to move from cash to digital currency."

>>> Click Here before it becomes law.

To see why some stocks plunged and others did not, look at the basic math of lending. Banks fund themselves at a certain cost—roughly 3.75% today—and lend to consumers at higher rates. The difference, or spread, is their profit.

For prime borrowers with excellent credit, a 10% cap is manageable: default rates are low, so lenders can accept a thinner margin. But for riskier or subprime borrowers, banks typically charge 20%–30% to cover higher default rates. That premium is necessary to offset losses from customers who never fully repay.

If regulators cap the APR at 10% while banks' cost of funds stays near 4%, the remaining ~6% margin is small. After operational expenses (staffing, branches, technology) and expected loan losses are deducted, a bank can lose money on every dollar lent to higher-risk borrowers.

The market quickly singled out companies most exposed to this "extinction zone":

Bread Financial (NYSE: BFH): The stock fell more than 10% in a session. Bread specializes in store-branded cards for mall retailers, which traditionally carry higher rates to offset risk. A 10% cap would threaten that business model because it prevents pricing for risk.
Synchrony Financial (NYSE: SYF): Down over 8%, Synchrony faces similar pressure. As a large issuer of private-label cards (for home-improvement stores and online retailers), much of its profit comes from interest income that could be curtailed by the cap.
Capital One (NYSE: COF): Off more than 6%, Capital One is seen as a subprime proxy among big banks. Its strategy of moving borrowers from lower-tier to higher-tier products depends on being able to price initial credit risk correctly; a cap threatens that pipeline.

A 10% APR limit effectively caps revenue for these businesses. For investors there are two scenarios to consider: if the regulation looks likely to take effect (the article uses Jan. 20, 2026 as a reference), some will short these stocks; if the administration backs away, the sell-off could represent attractive entry points.

The Credit Vacuum: The Bull Case for Fintech

When traditional banks pull back from subprime borrowers to protect margins, demand for consumer credit doesn't disappear—it migrates. As banks tighten standards and reject applicants with scores below roughly 660, a credit vacuum opens. That displacement is the bullish case for many fintechs.

Investors expect alternative lenders to fill the void left by banks. The key difference is business model. Conventional credit cards generate revenue from revolving interest (APRs). Many fintech companies emphasize Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) and other models that rely less on consumer APRs.

BNPL firms typically earn revenue by charging merchants a fee for processing transactions rather than depending primarily on high interest from consumers. Because their revenue streams come from retailers or fixed fees, they are relatively insulated from a consumer APR cap. While some BNPL names like Affirm (NASDAQ: AFRM) dipped on contagion fears, investors directed capital to companies that either lend differently or do not lend in the traditional sense.

Progressive Holdings (NYSE: PRG): Progressive's Lease-to-Own (LTO) model is viewed by some investors as a regulatory workaround. LTO arrangements are structured as rentals with an option to buy rather than loans in many jurisdictions, which can place them outside APR caps. As traditional card access tightens, these products could attract displaced subprime consumers.
Block (NYSE: XYZ): Block (parent of Cash App) remained relatively steady because its ecosystem leans on interchange revenue and fixed-fee borrowing arrangements rather than compounding interest. Investors see its closed-loop platform as a defensive moat against rate caps.
SoFi Technologies (NASDAQ: SOFI): SoFi dropped only modestly. Its digital ecosystem offers personal loans and alternative payment options, and investors expect increased demand for personal loans to refinance high-interest balances or replace lost credit lines.

The regulatory pressure on banks could accelerate growth for these fintech participants, which may become the new channels for consumer credit. Investors who believe the policy will be enforced should consider rotating into or initiating positions in select fintech names that are positioned to fill the credit gap.

The Fortress's Moats and Toll Roads

For investors seeking stability instead of aggressive growth, large diversified financial institutions offer some protection. While they were not immune to the sell-off, their size and revenue diversification cushion them more than smaller lenders.

JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM): The stock fell roughly 1.5%. That is modest compared with double-digit losses elsewhere. JPMorgan benefits from investment banking, asset management, and trading revenues that are largely insulated from consumer lending caps and can subsidize credit operations.
Visa (NYSE: V) & Mastercard (NYSE: MA): These firms act like economic toll roads. They operate the payment networks while issuing banks provide the credit. Although their shares slipped on worries about consumer spending, their fee-for-swipe model remains intact: they earn interchange fees regardless of an individual card's APR.

The New Rules of Engagement

The administration's proposal has redrawn the map for financial investors. The old correlation—where all bank stocks moved together—has broken. Markets are rewarding innovation and penalizing dependence on high-interest lending.

Legal challenges to the proposal are likely, but markets price probabilities, not certainties. At present the odds favor agile fintechs that can operate in a lower-rate environment over rigid, interest-dependent lenders. Smart money appears to be avoiding the extinction zone of pure-play high-rate lenders and buying into the credit vacuum being created by the next generation of financial technology.

Thank you for subscribing to The Early Bird, MarketBeat's 7:00 AM newsletter that covers stories that will impact the stock market each day.

This email content is a paid sponsorship from Behind the Markets, a third-party advertiser of The Early Bird and MarketBeat.

If you have questions or concerns about your subscription, please contact our U.S. based support team at contact@marketbeat.com.

If you no longer wish to receive email from The Early Bird, you can unsubscribe.

© 2006-2026 MarketBeat Media, LLC.
345 N Reid Pl. #620, Sioux Falls, SD 57103-7078. U.S.A..

From Our Partners: 7 High-Yield Dividend Stocks You Need to See (Click to Opt-In)